Home & construction

Roof and site peak runoff calculator

Estimate a rational-method peak flow from multiple entered areas and runoff coefficients, with a transparent comparison to supplied conveyance capacity.

Your numbers

One record per line with comma-separated cells. No thousands separators, quoted fields or commas inside names. All rows are entered observations or assumptions.

Calculated on your device. Your inputs aren’t sent to us.

Your result

Ready when you are

Enter your inputs and select Calculate.

Try it, understand it

Explore the result

Estimate a rational-method peak flow from multiple entered areas and runoff coefficients, with a transparent comparison to supplied conveyance capacity.

Worked example comparison
ExampleOutputWhat to notice
Worked exampleRational-method peak runoff3.333333 L/sThe example has 100 m² at coefficient 0.9 and 50 m² at 0.6, giving 120 effective square metres. At 100 mm/h, peak flow is 12000/3600, or 3.3333 L/s. The area-weighted coefficient is 120/150, or 0.8. Comparing with an independently supplied four L/s capacity leaves 0.6667 L/s of modeled headroom, not a pipe-sizing certification.
Change the explicit assumptionRational-method peak runoff5 L/sChange intensity while holding the other entries fixed; inspect the table and the model limits.

Check your understanding

Can I enter daily rainfall depth as intensity?

No. Intensity is a rate for a relevant storm duration, not a whole-day depth without a time basis.

Does this size my downpipe?

No. It estimates runoff and compares a separately established capacity.

Behind the numbers

How this calculation works

Peak drainage rate and harvested water volume answer different questions. A short intense burst can create a large peak without producing the largest daily water total. This page estimates a peak rate using the rational-method coefficient, intensity and contributing area.

THE FORMULAPeak L/s = rainfall mm/h × Σ(area m² × coefficient)/3600

A worked example

The example has 100 m² at coefficient 0.9 and 50 m² at 0.6, giving 120 effective square metres. At 100 mm/h, peak flow is 12000/3600, or 3.3333 L/s. The area-weighted coefficient is 120/150, or 0.8. Comparing with an independently supplied four L/s capacity leaves 0.6667 L/s of modeled headroom, not a pipe-sizing certification.

Good to know

Rational peak-rate scenario only; no local rainfall lookup, catchment timing solve, hydrograph, routing or drainage approval. A drainage designer must establish where the method applies and which duration, frequency, coefficient and blockage assumptions are appropriate.

What the model answers

Peak drainage rate and harvested water volume answer different questions. A short intense burst can create a large peak without producing the largest daily water total. This page estimates a peak rate using the rational-method coefficient, intensity and contributing area.

Multiple surfaces are combined by summing area times runoff coefficient. This gives an area-weighted coefficient rather than simply averaging the roof and paving coefficients as if their areas were equal.

The Rainwater daily tank balance calculator tracks stored harvest, overflow and unmet demand over days. That storage ledger is distinct from this short-duration drainage peak.

Measure and enter consistently

Use contributing horizontal drainage areas appropriate to the chosen method. Coefficients are user-supplied assumptions describing runoff response; they are not automatically chosen from a surface name.

The rainfall intensity must come from a duration and frequency relevant to the catchment, commonly linked to its time of concentration. An arbitrary daily rainfall average is not a substitute. The page does not look up local intensity-duration-frequency data.

Interpret the result

The capacity metric subtracts the estimated peak from a capacity established elsewhere. It does not calculate the capacity of a gutter, downpipe, inlet or channel from dimensions. A positive number is therefore conditional on that supplied capacity being valid.

There is no hydrograph or timing interaction between subcatchments. Storage, routing, inlet blockage and local design requirements can change a real drainage assessment beyond this compact peak-rate model.

Work through the numbers

The example has 100 m² at coefficient 0.9 and 50 m² at 0.6, giving 120 effective square metres. At 100 mm/h, peak flow is 12000/3600, or 3.3333 L/s.

The area-weighted coefficient is 120/150, or 0.8. Comparing with an independently supplied four L/s capacity leaves 0.6667 L/s of modeled headroom, not a pipe-sizing certification.

Where this model stops

Rational peak-rate scenario only; no local rainfall lookup, catchment timing solve, hydrograph, routing or drainage approval.

A drainage designer must establish where the method applies and which duration, frequency, coefficient and blockage assumptions are appropriate.

A few questions, answered

Can I enter daily rainfall depth as intensity?

No. Intensity is a rate for a relevant storm duration, not a whole-day depth without a time basis.

Does this size my downpipe?

No. It estimates runoff and compares a separately established capacity.

Find your calculator

Start typing to explore the library.